clear

Riddle me this Batman. When is a bike not a bike?

By Mark | December 10, 2010 |

Well the answer is when you live in the world of Bruck Easton where bikes are really diesel fume spewing trucks and bike lanes are equated to 12 lane highways.

What color is the sky in his world? Is it green over a blue grass?

Of course diverting traffic to Wyandotte has nothing to do with installing bike lanes to Riverside. One could argue that traffic calming bike lanes will actually encourage more traffic to move to Wyandotte. Especially now that it has been extended with the bridge at its far east.

Some have argued here that this was simply a battle of individual homeowners to prevent city own land that was encroached on from being returned to the public.

The most important misstatement of this letter is that One street of Riverside does not make a neighborhood. The hopes and dreams of the residents of Riverside Drive do not supersede that of their adjacent streets who have every right to enjoy the streets in their neighborhood beyond their own.

What we now have is another connection between residents of Riverside Dr. and the rest of their neighborhood which they seem to think they have no obligation to.

neighbourhood or neighborhood (see spelling differences) is a geographically localisedcommunity within a larger citytown or suburb. Neighbourhoods are often social communities with considerable face-to-face interaction among members. “Researchers have not agreed on an exact definition. Neighbourhood is generally defined spatially as a specific geographic area and functionally as a set of social networks. Neighbourhoods, then, are the spatial units in which face-to-face social interactions occur - the personal settings and situations where residents seek to realise common values, socialise youth, and maintain effective social control.” [1]

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon

4 Readers left Feedback


  1. Dave on Monday, December 13, 2010 at 8:36 am reply Reply

    Just more sour grapes from Mr. Easton and it doesn’t surprise me.

  2. Vincent Clement on Tuesday, December 14, 2010 at 4:05 pm reply Reply

    Bruck’s wife is no better. Over at Chris Schnurr’s blog, she was linking “expanded road surfaces to provide bike lanes” to environmental degradation. Seriously.

    Apparently, only those who live on Riverside Drive are able to enjoy the Scenic Drive designation.

    1. Chris Holt on Wednesday, December 15, 2010 at 9:48 am reply Reply

      That argument always made me shake my head. Are there many 2′ wide cars zipping around who would use the lanes for passing?

  3. juxtaposeur on Monday, December 20, 2010 at 9:47 pm reply Reply

    The problem I have with his idea of turning Riverside Dr. into a one-way street with bike lanes is that cyclists on the roads will have to travel only in the same direction as the vehicles (standard HTA verbage).

    Unless these bike lanes were laterally separated from the road, which have logistical problems of their own, such as driveway crossings and ROW allowances.

Feedback Form


 

clear